Now enrolling·AI Foundations

The Method

Strategic thinking requires compound vision

Decades of research across geopolitics, law, investment, and technology converge on one finding: those who understand complex problems best are rarely committed to a single lens. Nine dimensions shape how Dragonfly sees, each one sharpening the others as they compound.

The thesis: dragonfly eyes

20 years of research. 28,000 predictions. One finding.

Philip Tetlock tracked 284 experts making 28,000 predictions over two decades — the largest study of expert judgment ever conducted. The experts with the biggest media profiles were the least accurate. Single-framework thinkers did worse than random guessing.

The forecasters who consistently outperformed — including intelligence analysts with access to classified data — shared one trait: they systematically sought out and integrated multiple perspectives. Tetlock called this “dragonfly eyes.”

Anthea Roberts applied this research across two decades of academic work — and it became the intellectual foundation for Dragonfly Thinking.

The name isn't branding. It's the thesis.

Thinkers who deploy many analytical perspectives and synthesise them into a single judgment consistently outperform those who apply one powerful framework to every issue.

Philip Tetlock

Superforecasting

When leaders' thinking becomes simpler — when they stop integrating multiple perspectives — war follows. When they maintain that ability, crises resolve peacefully.

Suedfeld & Tetlock

Replicated from WWI to the Cuban Missile Crisis

The academic foundations

Built on two decades of multi-perspective research.

Dragonfly Thinking grew out of Anthea Roberts' academic research into how people see the same problems through different lenses — and what happens when you hold those perspectives in tension rather than choosing sides. Each project below built the next layer of the methodology.

Multi-perspective analysis

Is International Law International? book cover

Is International Law International?

Anthea Roberts · Oxford University Press, 2017

How international lawyers in different states see the same legal questions through fundamentally different lenses — patterns of difference, dominance, and disruption.

Multi-perspective synthesis

Six Faces of Globalization book cover

Six Faces of Globalization

Anthea Roberts & Nicolas Lamp · Harvard University Press, 2021

Six competing narratives about globalisation, held in tension rather than choosing sides. A methodology for integrative thinking about complex, contested problems.

Systemic driver mapping

Oxford University PressForeign Affairs

Risk, Reward and Resilience

Anthea Roberts · Journal of International Economic Law, 2023 and Foreign Affairs, 2023

How economic drivers interact systemically — mapping risks, rewards, and resilience across trade, technology, and geopolitics. The foundation for Dragonfly's driver and systems analysis methodology.

It helps us not only understand the best version of other sides' narratives, but also move beyond our own conceptual straitjackets.

Dani Rodrik

Harvard — on Six Faces of Globalization

Why AI is essential

AI doesn't replace the judgement — it creates the cognitive capacity to sustain compound vision.

Holding multiple competing perspectives simultaneously, mapping their interactions, tracing feedback loops and tipping points — this is precisely what humans struggle to do alone. AI creates the cognitive capacity to sustain compound vision long enough to produce insight.

But that only works with the right structure. Our method codifies expert thinking into structured analytical workflows — repeatable steps that AI can execute rigorously. The critical difference is between using AI and directing AI to think well.

The messy real world requires significant domain and application-specific reasoning that cannot efficiently be encoded in a general model. Enter cognitive architectures, or how your system thinks.

Sequoia Capital

Dragonfly's structured approach supports the kind of thinking that human teams often find difficult to sustain unaided.

AI CoLab pilot participant

Australian Public Service

The orchestration architecture

An agentic analytical system, not a chatbot.

Lens agents

0

Specialist analytical agents — actors, drivers, systems, scenarios, interventions, challenge, synthesis, and others.

Analytical skills

0+

Expert tradecraft encoded as readable skill files — methods, frameworks, and quality protocols agents draw on.

Dragonfly workflow

Frame the question. Challenge assumptions. Synthesise outputs.

AI tools without frameworks are just chatbots creating slop.

Huw McKay

Former Chief Economist, BHP